Relativism—the idea that truth is subjective—presents unique challenges in conversations. Module 10 of Navigating Beliefs dives headfirst into this tricky terrain, offering practical tools and insights for navigating these discussions. Let’s explore the journey of Reed, Rom, and Anthony as they shape this module.

Why Relativism?
Relativism often leaves people stuck in "my truth vs. your truth" scenarios, making it difficult to find common ground. Module 10 aims to help learners engage constructively with relativistic thinking without confrontation, encouraging self-reflection instead of defensiveness.

Core Strategies for Tackling Relativism

1. The Tic-Tac Test
   A simple yet powerful thought experiment.
   Scenario: You and a friend count a pile of Tic Tacs. Could there be two different correct answers?
   Purpose: Demonstrates the importance of shared truths in even seemingly subjective situations.

2. The Wall Test
   Challenges the limits of "my truth."
   Scenario: If someone believes a wall doesn’t exist, can they walk through it?
   Purpose: Highlights how physical reality can test subjective beliefs.

3. The Money Test
   Explores the necessity of objective standards in daily life.
   Scenario: A bank teller shortchanges you and claims, “My truth is you got the correct amount.”
   Purpose: Encourages thinking about fairness and shared reality in practical terms.

Probing Deeper Layers
Relativistic beliefs often connect to psychological or social needs, like identity, belonging, or control. Reed, Rom, and Anthony grappled with whether to address these deeper needs directly in the course. They decided to:

• Raise Awareness Help learners recognize these underlying motivations.
• Encourage Inquiry Equip learners with questions to explore these layers, such as:
  • “When did you first come to believe this is how truth works?”
  • “What would it mean for you if you were convinced not everyone could have their own truth?”

The Role of Pragmatism
Overly pragmatic thinking—focusing on what works rather than what’s true—can lead to overlooking misinformation. Instead of treating this as a standalone topic, the team integrates it with other themes like relativism and truth valuation, using tools like:

• The Outsider Test Encourages perspective-taking by asking how someone would feel if their own logic was used against them.
• The Box of Truth A thought experiment asking, “Would you want to know the truth, even if it was uncomfortable?”

A Holistic Approach to Belief Exploration
Module 10 isn’t just about techniques; it’s about fostering genuine dialogue. By exploring belief origins, psychological motivations, and practical consequences, the module equips learners to engage empathetically and thoughtfully with tough topics.

Takeaway:
From creative thought experiments to deeper introspection, Module 10 of Navigating Beliefs offers tools to address relativism while respecting individual perspectives. Ready to rethink how you navigate tough conversations? Visit NavigatingBeliefs.com to learn more.

For more thought-provoking discussions and updates, follow the Navigating Beliefs series and join the conversation today.